SHOULD THE US & BRITISH INTERVENE MILITARILY?
By Joel Rosenberg Go to Joel's website, www.joelrosenberg.com
Washington, D.C., August 21, 2013) -- President Obama appears to be on the verge of ordering U.S. military intervention in Syria. The British are preparing to help. The Obama administration believes there is “very little doubt” that the Assad regime used chemical weapons recently to commit massacres inside the civil war-torn country of Syria. UK Prime Minister David Cameron agrees, as does the French government. U.S. warships are en route and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel says the Pentagon is prepared for “all contingencies.”
Serious questions must be asked first. • Is genocide underway in Syria? Over 100,000 people have been killed. Now chemical weapons have been used several times. Can the world really turn a blind eye? • If so, how can the U.S. and the British not try to stop the use of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East, and stop what may already have become genocide, after going to war in Iraq to stop even the potential of WMD being developed and used against civilians? • Yet if the West does take military action to hit the Assad regime, won’t that help al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood rebels trying to bring down the Assad regime and impose and even more Radical Islamic Sunni regime? • Wouldn’t the President need Congressional authorization for military action in Syria? • And if the West is going to use military action in Syria, what about Iran which is developing nuclear weapons?
• “Are we heading towards catastrophic — even apocalyptic — events in Damascus?” • “Is it possible we will see the fulfillment of Bible prophecies such as Isaiah 17 and Jeremiah 49 that foretell the utter destruction and annihilation of the city of Damascus in the End Times?”
No comments:
Post a Comment